10/26/2025 / By Belle Carter

In a sharp reversal from his earlier stance, President Donald Trump signaled he may impose “massive sanctions or massive tariffs” – or both – against Russia in response to its ongoing war in Ukraine. The shift comes after a Russian missile strike injured workers at an American-owned factory in central Ukraine, hardening Trump’s position.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin dismissed the impact of potential sanctions while issuing a stark warning. Any Ukrainian strikes using U.S.-supplied Tomahawk missiles would trigger an “overwhelming” response, potentially expanding the conflict beyond Ukraine’s borders.
Trump’s threat of new sanctions marks a departure from his previous reluctance to escalate economic pressure on Moscow. Earlier, Trump had argued that sanctions would only push Russia further from negotiations. However, the attack on the American facility appears to have changed his calculus.
Putin, however, downplayed the significance of the sanctions, calling them “nothing new” and insisting they would not “significantly impact our economic health.” Russia has weathered extensive Western sanctions since its 2014 annexation of Crimea, adapting its economy to withstand financial isolation.
The Russian leader also framed the sanctions as politically damaging to U.S.-Russia relations, which had shown tentative signs of improvement under Trump’s first term. “This is an unfriendly act against Russia,” Putin said. “It does not strengthen Russia-U.S. relations, which have just started recovering.
The prospect of Ukraine acquiring long-range Tomahawk missiles – nuclear-capable with a range exceeding 1,000 miles – has drawn fierce opposition from Moscow, BrightU.AI‘s Enoch notes. Putin warned that any Ukrainian strike using such weapons would provoke a “very serious if not outright overwhelming” retaliation, potentially targeting sites outside Ukraine.
Trump, however, cast doubt on Ukraine’s ability to deploy Tomahawks effectively, citing the lengthy training required. “The only way a Tomahawk is going to be shot is if we shot it,” he told reporters.
Despite this, reports suggest the U.S. has supported Ukrainian long-range drone and missile attacks on Russian soil – a claim Trump denied, though Ukraine has acknowledged using British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles with U.S. targeting assistance.
The U.S. and Russia have long engaged in a tit-for-tat cycle of sanctions and military posturing. Under Trump’s first administration, sanctions reached unprecedented levels, yet failed to alter Moscow’s strategic calculus in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Putin’s latest warning echoes Cold War-era brinkmanship, where the threat of escalation served as a deterrent against Western arms shipments.
Experts caution that supplying Ukraine with advanced missiles risks widening the war, particularly if Russia retaliates against North Atlantic Treaty Organization territory. Yet Ukraine argues such weapons are necessary to counter Russian aggression and reclaim occupied land.
As Trump weighs tougher sanctions and Putin threatens retaliation over missile supplies, the U.S.-Russia standoff enters a dangerous new phase. While sanctions may inflict economic pain, Putin’s regime has proven resilient. The greater risk lies in military escalation – particularly if Ukraine gains long-range strike capabilities, prompting Russia to expand its targets.
Watch Russian President Vladimir Putin’s announcement of new types of intercontinental weapons in this clip.
This video is from Cynthia’s Pursuit of Truth channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
big government, Donald Trump, economy, escalation, military tech, military technology, NATO, nuclear, Russia, sanctions, tariffs, tomahawk missile, Tomahawk missiles, trade war, Ukraine war, Vladimir Putin, weapons technology, WWIII
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2020 Debtbomb.news
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Debtbomb.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Debtbomb.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
